While the US outdoor industry and its role in the public lands debate has been making headlines, the European outdoor industry is also engaged in nature conservancy – though here preferring financial support over direct activism.

“Conservation should be the core of all outdoor brands. Protecting nature is not only a good thing, it is something we as a business are dependent on,” maintains Christoph Centmayer, Sustainability Manager for Bergans of Norway.

Fortunately, this maxim has gained widespread support within the outdoor industry. Brands chipping in to various conservation pots has become virtually standard practice, where organizations like the European Outdoor Conservation Association (EOCA), the Conservation Alliance, and 1% for the Planet engage in conservation projects and advocacy on behalf of their members.

Centmayer points out that while taking direct responsibility for the social and sustainability of products is the natural domain of a company’s internal operations, when it comes to conservation advocacy “it’s a question of what kind of leverage a brand actually has alone.”

This is partly why pooling the resources of the entire industry into organizations like the EOCA has been the modus operandi for Bergans and many others. It’s also considered the strategy that leaves the job to the pros. As Tanya Bascombe, General Manager at EOCA explains:

“Companies do not need extra time and staff to look for, evaluate, monitor and manage projects themselves.”

Bascombe also notes that some brands choose to go it alone, and as far as she’s concerned there’s no reason why these two tactics cannot coexist:

“At the end of the day, all the money is going into conserving and looking after our wild spaces, which is the ultimate goal!”

Examples of projects supported by EOCA:

Batumi Raptor Trail Project

1. Batumi Raptor Trail Project

An effort to stave off illegal hunting of Georgia’s raptors by increasing their value for the locals.
Photo: Kalle Meller

Protecting old-growth forest

2. Protecting old-growth forest

Half of Sweden’s threatened species are dependent on old growth forest but only 3.8% of forest is currently protected.
Photo: Jukka Lausmaa

Mountain Wilderness Project

3. Mountain Wilderness Project

A team of volunteers work to remove obsolete installations from the Alps.
Photo: Emilien Maulave

Jonathan Eidse
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

More Stories

Carbon offsets & living forests – A lost cause?

Carbon offsetting via rainforest protection is widely criticized. With “phantom credits” and “carbon pirates,” shouldn’t companies and consumers just avoid all such investments? Not according to indigenous representatives in the Amazon.

By Marcus Haraldsson

‘Impossible to meet climate goals if we keep mowing down forests for boxes and t-shirts’

Most people won’t climb K2. What are the environmental and inclusivity implications of over-engineering gear as if they will?

By Nicole Rycroft

Saving old-growth forests – why is it important?

From scientists to global companies, forests are identified as a key to mitigating climate change. At the same time, deforestation continues. Meet one of the enthusiasts protecting forests – with the support of Swedish outdoor companies.

By Philipp Olsmeyer

What’s it going to be: Planet or Plastics?

The Earth Day theme for 2024 – Planet vs. Plastics – is a call to arms to reduce the production of plastics with 60% by 2040. Earthday.org’s Director of End Plastics Aidan Charron shares why the plastic curve needs to be bent downwards – urgently.


More News