They’re going to be around for a long, long time, so might as well get to know them by name. PFAS, PFCs, PFOAs, PFOs, PTFEs – what exactly do all these acronyms mean, and why have they been getting so much attention?

What are fluorocarbons?

Flourocarbons are a group consisting of roughly 4,000 long-lasting and often environmentally hazardous substances. The most widely known chemical among these is perhaps PFCs (perfluorocarbons), as well as PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluoroocatane sulfonate). More recently, PFAS (Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances) has become the accepted umbrella term for these flourocarbons. PFAS are used to make products resistant to stains, grease, soil and water. These characteristics are highly sought-after by outdoor enthusiasts, who are often subject to tough environments with a lot of cold, dirt and moisture. PFAS are extremely durable, surviving substantial wear and tear and temperature ranges, thus requiring less reapplication to maintain these repelling properties. This durability has earned them the nickname “Forever Chemicals” – but this is also where the problems begin to arise.

What are the environmental and health impacts of fluorocarbons?

Fluorocarbon emissions can occur at every stage of a PFAS-containing product’s lifecycle: during production itself, during use and washing, and when the clothing is thrown away or recycled. And because they are extraordinarily chemically stable, highly fluorinated substances break down extremely slowly in nature. Thus, they tend to accumulate and get spread across the environment by wind and water, eventually finding their way into food chains – including our own. Several of the compounds are suspected of being carcinogenic, and studies on animals have also shown that elevated levels can cause liver damage and affect both the immune system and the ability to reproduce.

While there is still a lot of uncertainty regarding exactly how dangerous these substances are for humans, it is clear that they are accumulating in all living organisms across the globe. Relatively high levels have been measured in polar bears in the Arctic, for example, and traces have been found in humans on all continents.

What can be done to mitigate the impacts of “Forever Chemicals”?

For one: Regulation. Some of the most toxic fluorocarbons, such as PFOS and PFOA are now widely restricted or are in the midst of being phased out. Manufacturers in many industries are working to produce fluorocarbon-free alternatives with similar properties. But as these substances are found in so many products, often imported from countries with lax regulation, phasing them out completely is proving to be much more difficult. Moreover, parts of the chemicals industry are trying to be one step ahead of regulators in developing new compounds of PFAS that are not yet fully assessed for their potential hazards. Thus legislation – and the consumer – are constantly left one step behind.

Are there sustainable alternatives to PFAS?

With these challenges in mind, there are large differences between manufacturers when it comes to their chemical management, and good choices are indeed available. In outdoor products, fluorocarbons have primarily been used in two areas: Partly in textile impregnations (often called durable water repellents, or DWR) to resist moisture, grease, and dirt, and partly in the production of membranes that help clothing ventilate moisture and excess heat while keeping moisture out. The breathable membranes are often made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). This is a fluorinated polymer made up of fluorine and carbon.

Greenpeace has for years protested against the usage of PFAS under the campaign Detox Outdoor, and raises questions about the release of toxic substances at the end of a PTFE treated product’s life cycle if not properly disposed of.  Today, there are a number of fluorocarbon free options to choose from both with DWR and membranes. Many brands have already phased out fluorocarbons completely, and several of the larger retail chains are working continuously to minimize the supply of waterproof clothing that is impregnated with fluorocarbons.

 

Illustrations: Nadia Nörbom

SUSTON
jonathan.eidse@norragency.com
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

More Stories

Recycling, upcycling & downcycling: What’s the difference?

Many outdoor companies use recycled materials to improve their ecological footprint and move towards circular business models. But what is upcycling and downcycling, and how do they fit into the bigger picture?

By SUSTON

Blueprint for a more sustainable skiing future

Learn more about low-impact skiing and how snow sports can become more sustainable, from the skis to the mountain operations.

By SUSTON

Outdoor Minimalism

An outdoor wardrobe that blurs the lines between work and play, using carefully selected equipment that can be used for all possible occasions. Here are ten tips to help outdoor enthusiasts make smart decisions for both their wallets and the environment.

By SUSTON

10 Outdoor Brands Pioneering Sustainability

On the way to a sustainable outdoor industry, companies are needed that set new standards and lead the way. Meet the most recognized sustainability leaders and find out what sets their sustainability efforts apart from the rest.

By SUSTON